Crazy Changes, Man!

I’ve been reading lots of articles like this, and my head is still chewing them over.

I mean- basically what we’re talking about is something that has the potential to slowly kill the film industry as we know it. In every article I read I keep waiting for them to tell us “The Solution”- the way to stop the changes- but so far nobody’s proposed a feasible one. As far as I can tell, digital media transfer will become easier and easier, and more and more socially acceptable, until we reach a point where the current means of film distribution (and in turn production) are no longer feasible.

Is this bad? I mean, my first instinct is to resist the changes- after all, the industry I grew up wanting to be in could be dying just as I get into it? Because everyone suddenly thinks stealing stuff is OK? It kinda gets me irked.

Filmmaking used to be reserved for the big studios. Sure, you could make a film with your Super 8mm Kodac camera, but anything above that generally became prohibitively expensive (at a feature film length) because of the cost of film stock and processing fees- not to mention all the equipment needed to edit it. And if you wanted your film to be seen by massive amounts of people you needed an outside resource to distribute it. Now, with the revolution of video, filmmaking is possible for most everyone. It really is like Gutenberg’s printing press, because what was once reserved for the Church (Hollywood), was then accessible to most everyone (growing steadily cheaper as the technologies to make books were improved and became more common). The internet now makes distribution more or less free- a process that previously, on a wide scale, generally cost millions of dollars.

But if Hollywood loses it’s competitive edge of “Massive Amounts of Money”, where does that leave us? A future I haven’t really wanted to consider, I guess, until I really think about it.

It’d leave us with hundreds of thousands of people creating independent content, at different levels of quality and entertainment- for the love of the craft. Filmaking finally becomes as much of an art as painting. And just like painting or most any other common medium, the good stuff will stick out above the noise.

It may be of some relevance to note, however, that there is not a multi-billion dollar “Painting Industry”.

I actually think this isn’t a half-bad future for movies. This is an awesome future for movies. It might even be a future I’d be willing to trade my desired career for.

Because the question remains- will it be possible, in this new future, to make money- enough money to support the creation of more films and the creators- off of the films? And how? I’m not optimistic enough to believe that donations would really bring in enough to support a whole film- but we’ll see. I think a complete reimagining of the medium is going to take place at some point in the coming decades, one that will be very difficult to anticipate. It could very well result in the end of “the industry”, but overall, in this competitive rich new atmosphere I think the odds are good we’ll be seeing significantly better films, perhaps more targeted to niche audiences.

All said, films-on-the-cheap are definitely going to be on the rise, and I think it’s great that we’re able to ride that wave.

Ping "Crazy Changes, Man!": http://robotsoup.com/mainblog/wp-trackback.php?p=128

Follow the discussion on "Crazy Changes, Man!" via RSS Feed

3 Comments

  1. Comment by Lobstro:

    Oh you didn’t just compare the Catholic church to Hollywood! ; )

    What epic times these are indeed! Maybe in the future movies will be able to get funding through T-shirt sales or something.

    19/03/2009 @ 4:40 am
  2. Comment by Paul The Great:

    Well. I guess instead of a content rating system, we’ll have to start a quality rating system, because…
    I know ppl who’ve got the red camera, and don’t even know anything about lighting..

    It doesn’t matter who’s got the biggest gun anymore now, but what matters is who’s got the best aim.

    Studios aren’t going to vanish. They’re going to have technology pretty darn soon that will smash indy films like Sound smashed silent.

    What we’re seeing right now is a small shaft of light through which internet videomakers can access theatres. However, as soon as theatres hit Film 3.0 indy films will become a thing of the past.

    20/03/2009 @ 2:26 am
  3. Comment by panzi:

    “Home Taping Is Killing Music” was the slogan of a 1980s anti-copyright infringement campaign by the British Phonographic Industry (BPI).
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Taping_is_Killing_Music

    “I say to you that the VCR is to the American film producer and the American public as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone.”
    – Jack Joseph Valenti, long-time president of the Motion Picture Association of America
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Valenti

    And someone said something similar about video renting, too.
    So I don’t believe it will be that bad as the MPAA & Co. are saying. ;)
    I think a lot of things downloaded over pirate bay & Co. are tv series that just weren’t aired yet in the countries of the downloaders. If the producers would manage to let them be broadcasted at the same time as in the country of its origin (preferably in “two channel sound”[1] – with original and translated voice tracks, but I would not mind only the original language), this would be no problem.

    [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zweikanalton

    28/03/2009 @ 1:07 am

Write comment